On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 19:12, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> On Oct 18, 2004, at 6:02 PM, Branko Èibej wrote:
> >
> > I'd even consider implementing lock timeouts as something mod_dav_svn
> > handles itself, so that the repopsitory wouldn't have to know about
> > lock timeouts at all.
> >
>
> I don't think we should be designing locking for only one RA layer.
I don't think that's what Branko meant, but I don't see how we can do
what he says unless mod_dav_svn can somehow pop up three minutes after
the lock request and nullify the lock.
(To put it another way: if I use mod_dav_svn to request a lock which
expires after three minutes, and then I use ra_local to attempt to
commit to the file five minutes later, that commit needs to succeed.
Which means either mod_dav_svn did something active three minutes after
the lock request, or ra_local knows something about lock expiry.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 19 01:23:13 2004