[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Locking consensus(es) so far

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2004-10-13 22:30:16 CEST

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> And I'd like to suggest a compromise regarding whether or not
> lock-messages are required:
>
> - client never requires lock-messages, but accepts them if
> presented.
> - server doesn't require them by default, but accepts them if
> presented.
> - admin can make pre-lock hook require them.

I would prefer to have it the other way around, like we do with log
messages. I've actually worked on a system that used similar messages
and they are useful. If we're going to have locks I'd like to encourage
people to have meaningful messages associated with them, just as we
encourage meaningful log messages.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 13 22:30:32 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.