Re: Locking consensus(es) so far

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> And I'd like to suggest a compromise regarding whether or not
> lock-messages are required:
>
> - client never requires lock-messages, but accepts them if
> presented.
> - server doesn't require them by default, but accepts them if
> presented.
> - admin can make pre-lock hook require them.

I would prefer to have it the other way around, like we do with log
messages. I've actually worked on a system that used similar messages
and they are useful. If we're going to have locks I'd like to encourage
people to have meaningful messages associated with them, just as we
encourage meaningful log messages.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 13 22:30:32 2004