[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] Correction to project FAQ regarding Win9x

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-10-12 18:30:09 CEST

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 05:09:53PM +0100, Simon Large wrote:
> "Ben Reser" wrote
> > Yeah I object. I have no idea what the patch is. It just shows up as
> > an encoded inlined file. Which mutt has no idea what to do with.
> That mutt would be me ;-)
> Sorry, Outlook Express = no control. I have re-attached with a .txt
> extension which may inline better. But when read in OE itself, .txt
> attachments are not inlined either :-(

It's still inlined and uuencoded. Not sure why OE is doing that. I
think you're going to have to use the paste in the body by hand
technique. Unfortunately, OE will probably wrap the patch and mess it

Also FYI mutt is a mail client, which almost always seems to know what
to do with peoples attachments. In fact this is the first time I've
ever seen a uuencoded attachment placed inline in the body of a message.
So I wasn't saying anyone was a mutt.

> > Also please include a log message or some sort of description of the
> > change.
> The log is at the top of the patch. Trying again ...

Yeah saw that.

To see what everyone else is seeing with your patches look here:

Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 12 18:30:26 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.