[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn 1.1.1 with r11211 - users perspective

From: Justin Erenkrantz <justin_at_erenkrantz.com>
Date: 2004-10-12 01:12:22 CEST

--On Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:02 AM +0200 Tobias Ringstrm
<tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> wrote:

> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> Um, it's hard to vote on something theoretical. If you has produced a
>> release candidate tarball, I'm sure you would have gotten the 3 votes
>> necessary to make 1.1.1 with just that patch in.
> Now you lost me. What makes r11211 theoretical, and how would a release
> candidate tarball make more developers vote?

The release was (and still is) theoretical. You suggested a 1.1.1 released
with r11211. There's a difference between talking about an abstract
concept (i.e. desire to have a 1.1.1 release with that fix included) and
then having a concrete release that can be tested (i.e. a file/tarball that
you propose for 1.1.1).

I'll note that this is different than having r11211 merged back to the
1.1.x branch. You still needed to get approval for r11211 to enter 1.1.x.
Yet, once there, you could have produced 1.1.1 candidate tarballs like I'm
suggesting... *shrug* -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 12 01:12:35 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.