Re: svn blame miscategorizing a file as binary

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 06:21:41PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> "Simon Large" <slarge@blazepoint.co.uk> writes:
>
> > No, Greg's (and Martin's) is a valid argument.
>
> Why? What goes wrong if the binary revisions are used? What terrible
> thing happens? Remember, everything that blame displays will be in
> the current text file.
>

Good point; all the lines displayed are present in the youngest
revision being blamed.

The diffing of the binary revisions might be memory and cpu
intensive, though.

--ben

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Oct 11 19:43:25 2004