Thanks, I will try to take care of those issues and log messages tomorrow 
night (Tuesday).
If the commit on the branch causes anyone problems, please revert them, 
I've been working 12-14 hour days the last 6+ weeks and have very little 
time for anything else for the next few weeks.
I'll try to make time to fix those issues tomorrow night and put them in a 
issue tracker list for review before commiting to the branch again as 
Tobias mentioned.
   Thanks,
   - David Summers
 On 27 Sep 2004 kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Date: 27 Sep 2004 10:35:06 -0500
> From: kfogel@collab.net
> To: David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us>
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r11143 - branches/1.0.x/packages/rpm/redhat-8+
> 
> Tobias Ringström <tobias@ringstrom.mine.nu> writes:
> > >Author: david
> > >Date: Sun Sep 26 23:11:55 2004
> > >New Revision: 11143
> > >
> > >Modified:
> > >   branches/1.0.x/packages/rpm/redhat-8+/doc.patch
> > >   branches/1.0.x/packages/rpm/redhat-8+/subversion.spec
> > >
> > Um, you committed this to the 1.0.x branch...
> 
> His log message seemed to indicate that this was intentional:
> 
>  | r11143 | david | 2004-09-26 23:11:55 -0500 (Sun, 26 Sep 2004) | 12 lines
>  | 
>  | Note: The 1.1.0 branch and trunk don't seem to have this problem so I'm just
>  |       fixing it here.
>  | 
>  | * packages/rpm/redhat-8+/doc.patch : Fix book Makefile patch to work again
>  |      after breakage that happened right before 1.0.7 was release.  This also
>  |      fixes the shell-script bug where the number was not being inserted
>  |      correctly because of the parentheses instead of braces.
>  | 
>  | * packages/rpm/redhat-8+/subversion.spec : Fix specfile to output
>  |      the version to the book version.xml instead of the release.
> 
> But, a separate question is whether this change had a confirming +0
> vote from some other committer, as required by our release-branch
> review policies.  I don't see any other committer listed in the log
> message, so it looks like David approved this solo.
> 
> David, I just reviewed it now, intending to save you the trouble of
> having revert the change, then get a +0 from someone, then
> reapply... But I can't offer a +0 yet, because I have some questions.
> 
> Regarding the change:
> 
> I can see one place where you substituted curly braces for parens, in
> doc.patch.  But you left other parens untouched, even though it seems
> to me they're being used in the same way?  Why not change them all?  I
> think the current inconstency is both likely to cause confusion, and
> likely to cause some sort of subtle bug later on when one style is
> cut-and-pasted into a context where the other style would have been
> needed.  It would be better if there were a comment explaining why the
> difference, or (if possible) one style used consistently?
> 
> Regarding the log message:
> 
> Don't you also want to say that you removed the word "Draft" from the
> book's revision label, in doc.patch?  And you might want to fix this
> ambiguity:
> 
>  | * packages/rpm/redhat-8+/subversion.spec : Fix specfile to output
>  |      the version to the book version.xml instead of the release.
> 
> It sounds like the change is to output the version "to version.xml"
> instead of "to the release" -- when what's actually happening is
> you're outputting the version, instead of the release, to version.xml.
> 
> (Btw, I don't know the difference between the "version" and the
> "release", so I wasn't able to review that bit of the change.)
> 
> -Karl
> 
-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 28 07:31:02 2004