Re: Subversion 1.1.0 Release Candidate 4 released. *SECURITY FIX*

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:

> On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 08:45, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Let me clarify my opinion. I don't think this syntax error is worth a
> > whole new RC5 release, nor do I think it justifies re-starting the
> > 1.1.0 last-week soak period.
>
> I disagree. Our code is supposed to be C89-compliant, and we have a
> glaring syntax error by that standard. It's not catastrophic that a
> release candidate would have this mistake, but it's certainly not worthy
> of a 1.1.0 release.

I think what Ben is saying is that we just make sure the fix is in the
1.1.0 final tarball (and that, so far, it is the *only* difference
between the rc4 and final tarballs).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 23 17:46:19 2004