[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r11035 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_wc tests/clients/cmdline

From: Andy Whitcroft <apw_at_shadowen.org>
Date: 2004-09-21 10:13:15 CEST

On Monday 20 September 2004 18:22, Josh Pieper wrote:

> I believe that is the case, however, it is unlikely that someone would
> add a new file with already expanded keywords, so it was probably
> never noticed before.

I've not looked at the patch, but am wondering if this could explain some odd
behaviour that I only half noticed when I was recovering from some finger
trouble with a persistant WC. Would subversion prior to this patch have not
correctly fixed kerwords in a file added which already contained expanded
keywords. In my case a file which was moved within the repository?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 21 10:13:53 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.