[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10971 - trunk/www

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-09-17 05:22:44 CEST

On Sep 16, 2004, at 6:36 PM, Greg Hudson wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-09-16 at 19:21, Benjamin Pflugmann wrote:
>>> +<li><strong>Non-database repository back-end</strong>
>>> + <p>Repositories can be created with either a traditional database
>>> + back-end (BerkeleyDB) or with normal flat-file back-end, which
>>> + uses a proprietary binary format.</p>
>
> Oops, didn't catch that. It's also not a binary format, except for the
> svndiff data.
>

Isn't a file which contains binary data (i.e. NULL bytes) a "binary"
file? For example, isn't our dump format a "binary" format, since it
can contain literal fulltext of binary files or svndiff data, despite
the fact that it's mostly human-readable? And by that same definition,
isn't the fsfs revision file a "binary" format file?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 17 05:26:49 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.