Re: Thoughts and open questions on patch/dump unification
From: Jani Averbach <jaa_at_jaa.iki.fi>
Date: 2004-09-17 03:59:50 CEST
On 2004-09-16 12:56-0400, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > > I have precious little interest in seeing Subversion become a
Same here, and at the mean time when we don't have that, I would like
You can have two URLs in your working copy, one for read-only
Now you could do your checkout from your local slave, and when you are
The master could distribute changes to the slaves by using incremental
It is true that you won't get truly distributed system that way, but
- Load on your master will be smaller
- you could divide your team between distances and use thin and/or
- If you lose your connection to the master, you still could see logs,
BR, Jani
-- Jani Averbach --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Fri Sep 17 04:00:08 2004 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.