Re: Thoughts and open questions on patch/dump unification

Dave Rolsky wrote:

>>in a cleaner way. At the very least I'd be happier if the svk-equivalent
>>stuff were in Python, which I think has better long-term maintainability.
>
>
> So basically you have no meaningful criticism here, you just want to start
> a language war. Good idea. Then we can fight about emacs vs. vim
> afterwards!
>
> Seriously, _you_ might be happier if it were in Python, but other people
> wouldn't be. Who cares? Unless you plan to write an SVK-alike in Python
> what's the point of bringing this up?

+1

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Sep 17 01:31:12 2004