Re: Thoughts and open questions on patch/dump unification

cmpilato@localhost.localdomain wrote on 09/16/2004 11:28:22 AM:

> > It is then a policy question whether the action list becomes a
> > commit.
>
> Nope.
>
> And from here, it's obvious that you and I have such differing ideas
> on what we're working on here that further response will only add
> confusion. :-)
>
> Maybe I missed some thread posts, but I thought we were talking about
> a custom patch format for Subversion. Eric, you seem to be thinking
> more about some sort of history replication mechanism which is far
> more involved than just a patch format. Are we on differing planets?

I started to write a similar reply as I was also thinking of this as a
patch you would apply to a WC then you would just resolve conflicts and
commit as normal. However, I then recalled Eric did mention previously
that he saw this as a way of synching repositories. For example:

http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svn/archive-2004-09/0472.shtml

Probably worth exploring his ideas on that as well as the apply to WC
scenario.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Sep 16 17:36:52 2004