Re: svn commit: r10907 - branches/1.1.x

"Max Bowsher" <maxb@ukf.net> writes:
> > Doesn't r10904 change an API by adding a pool (svn_utf_initialize)?
> >
> > If so, then it can't happen in a patch release.
>
> That change is catching up with the new signature *already* in place
> on the 1.1.x branch as of r10877.
>
> So, all is ok.

Thanks.

Is there some reason we did things in that order, instead of the more
usual trunk-first order?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Sep 12 01:32:07 2004