Re: Out of date errors just after a revert

On Friday 10 September 2004 09:15, Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Is that really true? A colleague managed to scrap his woking copy by
> doing the following.
> - svn up -> so there are no uncommitted changes.
> - "svn add foo" a folder inside his working copy
> - suddenly notice that there was a subfolder (foo/bar), that he didn't
> want to add.
> - "svn revert ."
> - remove the annyoing subfolder (bar)
> - retry to add foo -> "svn: warning: 'foo' is already under version
> control" - "svn ci" -> "Working copy 'D:/TESTPR~1/xxx/foo/bar' not
> locked" - "svn cleanup" -> no comment

You should have done "svn revert foo" instead of "svn revert ."

-- 
Marc Haisenko
Systemspezialist
Webport IT-Services GmbH
mailto: haisenko@webport.de
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org