Re: svn commit: r10835 - trunk/subversion/include

maxb@tigris.org writes:
> --- trunk/subversion/include/svn_io.h (original)
> +++ trunk/subversion/include/svn_io.h Mon Sep 6 01:05:04 2004
> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@
> apr_pool_t *pool);
>
> /**
> - * @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.1.0 API.
> + * @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.0.0 API.
> *
> * Lock file at @a lock_file. If @exclusive is TRUE,
> * obtain exclusive lock, otherwise obtain shared lock.
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@

Is this the right change? When deprecating something, we should say
it's "provided for backward compatibility with" the earliest
Subversion possible, since that implies all later ones anyway.

Saying 1.0.0 API here would imply the 1.1.0 API too, but saying 1.1.0
doesn't include 1.0.0. Don't we want to include both?

This only applies to the "@deprecated" portions of this commit, not
the "@since" changes, of course.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 8 18:23:35 2004