[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: request for backporting to 1.1.x

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson_at_MIT.EDU>
Date: 2004-09-06 21:22:14 CEST

On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 15:16, Stefan wrote:
> > As it turns out, it looks like we might
> > experience significant performance degradation if we don't call
> > svn_utf_initialize().

> I thought not
> activating it would at least not endanger the command line client but
> still give TortoiseSVN the chance to use it.

But the translation code path is affected by r10788 whether or not the
initialization function is called. It's just affected in different

> And yes, the performance without caching the translation functions (keep
> the so files loaded and reuse them instead of loading/unloading them) is
> really, really bad.

Perhaps you don't understand; if we backport r10788 and don't call
svn_utf_initialize() in the command-line client, it looks like we would
experience significant performance degradation *relative to current 1.1

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 6 21:22:56 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.