Re: request for backporting to 1.1.x

On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 15:16, Stefan wrote:
> > As it turns out, it looks like we might
> > experience significant performance degradation if we don't call
> > svn_utf_initialize().

> I thought not
> activating it would at least not endanger the command line client but
> still give TortoiseSVN the chance to use it.

But the translation code path is affected by r10788 whether or not the
initialization function is called. It's just affected in different
ways.

> And yes, the performance without caching the translation functions (keep
> the so files loaded and reuse them instead of loading/unloading them) is
> really, really bad.

Perhaps you don't understand; if we backport r10788 and don't call
svn_utf_initialize() in the command-line client, it looks like we would
experience significant performance degradation *relative to current 1.1
levels*.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Sep 6 21:22:56 2004