On 30 Aug 2004 09:11:51 -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote :
>Duncan Murdoch <subversion@murdoch-sutherland.com> writes:
>> I've still left out the "update *" example: it was what confused me
>> in the first place! Windows users aren't likely to appreciate the
>> difference between "update" and "update *", because "*" is different
>> there than in Unix: it means "all files", and can include files that
>> don't exist at the time the command is typed (but do by the time the
>> FindNextFile search gets to them).
>
>Hmm. Even with the difference you describe above, I still don't see
>how "update *" would behave differently on Windows than on Unix? Can
>you give an example?
It behaves the same in Unix and Windows as far as I know. I left it
out for clarity, not because it wouldn't work. I want the reader to
understand what's going on, and "update *" is just a distraction.
Duncan Murdoch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 30 21:20:22 2004