Re: [PATCH] Re: mbk's recovery lock change

On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 10:10, Tobias Ringström wrote:
> The attached patch implements your "other alternative" above, and also
> makes it possible to interrupt svnadmin while waiting for the lock.
> Opinions?

Your patch looks correct to me (I'm surprised that APR's apr_signal
layer is so thin that it's appropriate to use SIG_DFL, but it seems to
be that way). I'd still like to see more people's opinions on what the
correct behavior is.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 29 17:07:37 2004