[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r10686 - branches/1.1.x/subversion/po

From: Øyvind A. Holm <sunny_at_sunbase.org>
Date: 2004-08-23 11:51:55 CEST

On 2004-08-21 20:17:53 Lübbe Onken wrote:
> Øyvind A. Holm wrote:
> > Is this a Good Thing, i.e. editing directly on the branch? They say
> > everything that's going to the 1.1.x branch should be merged from
> > trunk,
>
> Yep, I know. I first did the trunk translation, then compared it to
> the 1.1.x branch and decided to do it this way. msgfmt didn't complain
> and the build succeeded, so I felt quite comfortable in doing so.

I do agree with this way of doing it, and I would like to get some
directions on what the policy about this should be. Is it OK to edit .po
files directly on the branch if msgfmt -c says the files are correct? I
hope so, it would be nice to get the translation complete.

Сенсорно Ваш,
Ойвин Хольм
----------------------------------------------------------------------
“There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don’t believe this to be a coincidence.”
  - Jeremy S. Anderson

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Aug 23 11:52:20 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.