On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 19:01, Philip Martin wrote:
> > Does it make sense for to look for a suitable xlate handle in the
> > parent pools before falling back and creating a new one in the current
> > pool? If such a handle is found it could be stored in the current
> > pool so that the search would only occur once per pool.
>
> Yes, I proposed the same thing at some point, though perhaps only over
> IRC. That, possibly in addition to a few strategic calls to a new
> function which deliberately places an xlate handle in a pool, would
> probably solve our problem.
>
This was discussed earlier on this thread. If a pools parent is in a
different thread, this will not work. You can't use a xlate handle in
different threads at the same time, AFAICK.
//Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 13 07:43:19 2004