Re: [FEAT. REQ] Aggregate working copy ?

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-07-31 15:32:32 CEST

On Sat, 2004-07-31 at 07:32, Dominique PERETTI wrote:
>
> What do you think ?
>

You've described a feature already in our long-term plans. Namely,
.svn/entries files should be able to "link" together, even if the
working copies are from separate repositories. 'svn commit' would then
aggregate changes per-repository, and guarantee only 1 commit per
repository. In this vision, the svn:externals feature would be used
only for checkouts (initial construction of the aggregate working
copy). After that, everything would "just work" because entries files
would be directly linked.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Jul 31 15:35:09 2004

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Norbert Unterberg: "Recursive client operations not intuitive"
Previous message: Vincent Lefevre: "svn/svnadmin freezes (timeout in select)"
In reply to: Dominique PERETTI: "[FEAT. REQ] Aggregate working copy ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]