Re: svn commit: r10429 - branches/1.1.x/subversion/po

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:02:15AM +0200, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 dionisos@tigris.org wrote:
>
> > Author: dionisos
> > Date: Tue Jul 27 13:17:16 2004
> > New Revision: 10429
> >
> > Modified:
> > branches/1.1.x/subversion/po/de.po
> > branches/1.1.x/subversion/po/es.po
> > branches/1.1.x/subversion/po/nb.po
> > branches/1.1.x/subversion/po/sv.po
> > Log:
> > Merge translation updates.
> >
> > Merge trunk revisions
> > r10254,
> > r10282,
> > r10409,
> > r10412,
> > r10415,
> > r10418,
> > r10423,
> > r10426.
> >
> >
> Some of these (the changes to es and sv) include formatting strings and
> require voting per hacking. Maybe this was discussed when you were away...

I thought by that we meant you couldn't change the argument ordering,
add any arguments to a message, or change the types of the arguments.
Not that you couldn't touch something that was used as a format call.
Now if you change a %d to %ld then you'd be violating that. But I don't
think adding:

+msgid "Unsupported FS loader version (%d) for fsfs"
+msgstr "Aplique RA binariamente incompatible (versión %d) para ra_dav"

violates thats. Am I missing some case where adding that would be bad?

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org