Re: svn log causes XML parse error (internal error)

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Ben Reser <ben@reser.org> writes:
>
>>As far as this being DAV specific. I presume that DAV is where we got
>>the whole concept of properties and our properties are designed around
>>that specification. I don't see what's so bad about having some
>>limitations on property names. So long as those limitations are spelled
>>out. Which I think we've done a poor job of doing.
>
>
> No, we didn't get the idea of properties from DAV. We knew we wanted
> key/value pairs even before we'd heard of DAV. Now we are imposing
> limitations on the keys, because of one (out of three) RA protocols.
> [...]

Sorry if this is a stupid idea; I haven't had the time yet to read all
the specs.

Could the pf:property-displayname be bent to express the real property
name? I am aware that it is supposed to be language specific, but I
don't see anything wrong with fixing it at xml:lang="en" for that purpose.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-06.txt

/Klaus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 22 12:22:55 2004