[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: RFC: Process for 1.x.0 releases

From: Peter N. Lundblad <peter_at_famlundblad.se>
Date: 2004-07-20 00:26:04 CEST

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Ben Reser wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 02:02:44PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> > So, I'd suggest, for a .0 release:
> >
> > * Weeks 1-3: minor bugfixes can go in, following the same criteria
> > as we'd use for a patch release (with the API rules relaxed
> > because there's no release to maintain API compatibility with).
> >
> > We put out a second release candidate at the end of week 3 if we
> > made any changes.
> >
> > * Week 4: only a critical bugfix can go in, and we put out another
> > release candidate and restart week 4 if we do that. Other fixes
> > are delayed until 1.x.1.
> >
> > * If a showstopper bug forces us to make a significant change, we
> > restart the four-week soak period wherever we are. If we can't
> > agree informally on whether a fix requires restarting the soak
> > period, we vote.
>
> +1 from me.
And me.

//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 20 12:02:15 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.