--- Michael <ectosphenoid-svn@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2004-07-18 at 19:59, Michael wrote:
> > > Here is a better example of the memory leak.
> >
> > I don't know if this kind of memory use is expected from cleanup.
> > Entries caching may be relevant, though I think there's something
> > more than that going on.
>
> There has to be more than that going on as I do tests like this
> periodically and previous versions of subversion didn't have this
> leak. So this is either a new "feature" or a regression.
I may have found the problem (or part of it) while working on an
updated patch for issue 1310. Some subpool creations don't appear to
have matching destroys. I'll post more once my tests are done.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 19 21:30:28 2004