Re: libsvn_swig_py.so not being installed

On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 05:28:09PM -0700, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 06:05:11PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/pipermail/swig-dev/2003-November/012288.html
> >
> > says:
> >
> > | Proposal:
> > | ---------
> > ...
> > | 7. The Runtime directory
> > |
> > | The current Runtime directory, libtool, and all associated files will
> > | be deleted and no longer used.
> >
> > This proposal seems to have been well-received.
>
> This is probably a good thing. The number one problem people have
> installing SWIG bindings is runtime version mismatches. This would
> avoid that problem entirely.

Actually this is already implemented:
http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Modules.html

clkao has pointed out that our current Perl bindings fail when trying to
install against multiple versions of Perl on the same machine. Linking
the runtime into the _Core.so ought to help eliminate that.

Something to mess with after we branch for 1.1.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org