* Michael W Thelen <thelenm@cs.utah.edu> [2004-07-03 18:52]:
> * Michael W Thelen <thelenm@cs.utah.edu> [2004-07-03 15:25]:
> > Anyway, this discussion is a bit separate from the actual patch. In a
> > little while I'll send a new patch containing what you suggested: only
> > the (b) special case handling, with the other changes removed.
>
> Okay, here's a new patch. It only contains the changes necessary to fix
> the problem of running 'svn log' on a working copy at BASE revision 0.
> This time I also delved into the wondrous world of Python and added a
> test case. I'm hoping that it actually does what I think it does, and
> tests this change. Happily, the test fails on /trunk but passes after
> applying this patch. :-) Just a warning that you may want to inspect
> the Python code particularly closely.
I created a new issue for this bug (#1950) and included a link to this
patch. The "working copy at revision 0" bug is different from issue
#692, and the bug still exists in /trunk (harmless as it may be :). I'd
like to see at least this patch make it into 1.1 if possible, since it's
such an easy fix.
-- Mike
--
Michael W. Thelen
Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think.
-- Niels Bohr
Received on Tue Jul 6 23:12:16 2004