"Marc Strapetz" <marc.strapetz@smartcvs.com> writes:
> I also didn't mean to treat svnserve as second-class citizen. I hope to find
> out whether the community (including users) favours one kind of server. I
> have a quite clear picture of where I would personally use svnserve, but I
> can't estimate the potential of the combination WebDAV/DeltaV/SVN. From what
> I read in your book, it sounds promising, because version control could
> spread to users, which normally would not make use of such technologies ...
>
> Do you expect both servers to be equally well accepted (at least for the
> medium-term)? No mod_dav_svn/apache hype, administrators refusing to open
> the svnserve-port, etc.?
No formal survey has been taken, as far as I know. But my impression
from watching the users@ and dev@ list is that it really is about
50/50. I would expect that to continue; and yes, expect both to be
equally well accepted.
> As I wrote, we are evaluating pros and cons of developing a pure java client
> library -- and the number of users is the ultimate argument. From this point
> of view, which protocol would you suggest to start with?
I don't think there's any obvious guidance to give here; one would
have to say "both" :-). Flip a coin, I guess.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 6 01:11:13 2004