On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 14:46:04 +0200, Marc Strapetz
<marc.strapetz@smartcvs.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are currently evaluating possibilities for building a java-based SVN
> client, still unsure if to use javahl or not. After reading the SVN book, I
> got some uneasy fealing about the future of svnserve, which could be one
> starting point for developing a pure java client library. Is the
> Apache/WebDAV combination the favoured server component and svnserve just
> some attachment for those who don't want to administer Apache? Would it be
> appreciated to push svnserve (at least for the first step) by such a client
> library or is it counterproductive regarding the future plans of SVN? And
> how important is or should be the role of SVN as WebDAV backend?
>
> Thanks in advance for any ideas on this topic.
I'm not sure where you're getting your ideas about svnserve having any
kind of 'uneasy' future, but it's simply not true. svnserve is just
as supported as mod_dav_svn/apache, and will continue to be supported
for the forseeable future. Personally, I make use of svnserve far
more often than I do mod_dav_svn/apache for my own repositories, and I
suspect that is not all that uncommon.
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 5 14:50:59 2004