Klaus Rennecke wrote:
> Josh Pieper wrote:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> Does anyone have objections to just removing the ".." collapsing
>> support from svn_path_canonicalize?
>> [...]
>>
>
> This is why I was asking for it in the first place (example from
> 2004-06-20):
>
> tukan:[kre]> svn --version
> svn, Version 1.1.0 (dev build)
> übersetzt Jun 20 2004, 18:52:50
> [...snip...]
> tukan:[kre]> svnadmin create /tmp/1901
> tukan:[kre]> svn mkdir -m "" file:///tmp/1901/branches
> Revision 1 übertragen.
> tukan:[kre]> svn mkdir -m "" file:///tmp/1901/branches/branch1
> Revision 2 übertragen.
> tukan:[kre]> svn copy -m "" file:///tmp/1901/branches/branch1
> file:///tmp/1901/branches/branch1/../branch2
> subversion/libsvn_repos/commit.c:114: (apr_err=160028)
> svn: Out of date: '/branches/branch1/..' in transaction '3'
But paths and URLs behave differently, don't they?
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Jul 4 18:38:22 2004