Re: Subversion documentation

On Jul 1, 2004, at 7:13 AM, subversion@smartcvs.com wrote:

> After reading a lot of the subversion book, I must admit, that
> Subversion looks _much_ better designed than CVS (or should I say, it
> looks designed?). And the book itself is very well-written,
> congratulation.

Thanks!

> Just curious, what tool you used to write this book - docbook and a
> decent renderer?

Actually, we used a DTD from O'Reilly called "DocBook Lite" along with
xsltproc and Jakarta Fop. That plus a Makefile and emacs... :-)

-Fitz

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 1 17:52:06 2004