Re: Issue #1509, shared working copies and svn:executable

On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 10:48, Josh Pieper wrote:

> In IRC, ghudson said:
>
> > Yes. Given that "svn up" while editing is known not to be safe, I
> > don't think we have a mandate to try to prevent data loss only some of
> > the time in that situation, at the expense of making shared working
> > copies work.
>
> What does everyone else think?

It's already possible to run 'svn up', get nothing but a propchange
(eol-style or keywords), and have the working file changed.

"If there's a precedent for it, it *must* be ok!"

I say just do it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 30 16:02:16 2004