[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Unix-only code (was Re: svn commit: r10060 - trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs)

From: John Peacock <jpeacock_at_rowman.com>
Date: 2004-06-24 19:55:12 CEST

Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 13:10, John Peacock wrote:
>
>>Are there really that many people cross-compiling (if that is what you
>>are talking about)?
>
>
> No, but are there really that many people trying to build Subversion on
> VMS? It's about correctness, not numbers.
>

But that is exactly my point. Excluding codepaths based on the #define
WIN32 as a binary test is demonstratably not correct; the world is much
more complicated than just WIN32 and everything else, especially when
you are trying to perform very Unix-specific bit-twiddling. The fact
that the existing code makes that overly broad assumption doesn't make
it right. It's about correctness, not numbers. ;)

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 24 19:55:34 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.