Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:58:32PM -0400, Russell Yanofsky wrote:
>> Ben Reser wrote:
>>> We're using the infrastructure that Perl
>>> provides for building and installing extensions. In order to just
>>> use the generator we'd have to re-engineer all of this
>>> infrastructure. I'm not inclined to do that...
>>
>> Couldn't you use the build generator to build the extensions and the
>> existing Perl infrastructure to install them? The build generator
>> already knows how to build swig modules, it just needs to be tweaked
>> to use the right parameters and filenames.
>
> The build generator only knows how to build the libsvn_swig_perl
> library. As far as I know it has never known how to build the actual
> bindings, not just our support library, properly.
>
> I find it really odd that you advocated a build process that is
> obviously completely different than the other swig bindings builds and
> then 4 minutes later argue against the current setup on the basis that
> it is different the other swig bindings build.
Huh? I've advocated using the subversion make generator instead of MakeMaker
to build the perl modules. This is closer to what the other languages do.
- Russ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 23 01:55:15 2004