kfogel@collab.net wrote:
>Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
>
>
>>Well, that's a good argument for having a backup script based on dump
>>files. (I don't think it has to be a huge project, contrary to what
>>Branko said.) But such a thing doesn't qualify as a "hot" backup, so we
>>shouldn't consider it as a replacement for svnadmin hotcopy.
>>
>>
>
>How is it not hot? I thought "hot" just meant that the backup is
>performed while the repository is live, and does not affect the
>repository's availability for normal use. Dumpfile generation meets
>these criteria.
>
>
Yes, it does. It's not the most /efficient/ kind of hot backup, but it
does meet the criteria.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 21 22:58:14 2004