Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 12:28, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > Cleanliness dictates that I think that --targets should only be used
> > for the "vararg" portions of a subcommand's argument set
>
> Agreed.
>
> > but that still might leave some subcommands whose
> > required arguments exceed the shell maximum for command-line length
> > (which is, after all, the problem which --targets was designed to
> > solve).
>
> I don't understand this concern.
Maybe the concern is bogus. I figured that URLs and paths could be
arbitrarily long, so it's conceivable that you could have a simple 1-
or 2-argument command-line that is still so long that a weaker shell
(such as is found in Win9x) would not be able to deal. Not a very
likely case, I admit, but...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 18 04:01:16 2004