[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: Locking proposal: The update-and-lock model

From: Stein Roger Skafl¸tten <srs_at_keymind.no>
Date: 2004-06-17 11:21:01 CEST

> Did you mean to send this to the list?

Yes ;-)

>
> >>There's one problem with leases that you've overlooked: if people tend
> >>to forget to unlock stuff, they'll definitely forget to renew their lock
> >>lease; or the'll simply revert to taking out week-long locks. You don't
> >>gain a thing.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Good point, Branko. Of course, this could be configurable (maximum lease
> length), but then it gets too complicated.
> >
> >Do you have any estimates on when the locking implementation will ship?
> Version 1.2?
> >
> >
> We're in the design phase, which means it's probably too late for 1.1.
> So 1.2 is a good guess, because locking is fairly high on our priority
> list.
> --
> Brane Èibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 17 18:13:28 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.