Re: r9990 breaks build

On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

> On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 23:02, David Summers wrote:
>
> > so I think that get_flags must also be part of DB 4.2.52 and not DB
> > 4.0.14. To speed things up and preclude any more "how about this" :-)
> > I'm attaching a patch that fixes it (for me, there may be a better way
> > to do it).
>
> Oy! What a pain. I guess your patch will do. It bugs me, because now
> we're using DB_LOGFILE_AUTOREMOVE as an existence test for db 4.2 or
> later. There's got to be a more elegant way to test for 4.2 than that.
> :-(
>

I feel your pain. :-) Yeah, I know what you mean.....like I said, if
there is a better way to do it, I'm all ears.

-- 
David Wayne Summers          "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us   PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B  60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org