[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Discussing r8708 for 1.0.x

From: Ben Reser <ben_at_reser.org>
Date: 2004-06-14 00:38:39 CEST

On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:13:01PM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> "Erik Huelsmann" <e.huelsmann@gmx.net> writes:
> > Since before 1.0.1 r8708 has been nominated in STATUS and at the same time
> > being vetoed by breser pending discussion.
> >
> > Could we have that discussion now in order to be done before 1.0.3 (whenever
> > that is), or remove it from STATUS as non-essential?
>
> +1 on removing it. I don't see any reason such a change belongs in a
> 1.0.x release.

I just never got around to doing the new change. We pretty much had the
discussion and we came up with a way to do it the new way in newer perls
and the old way in the older perl versions. I'll commit the change.

I'm not going to worry about backporting it to 1.0.x since we're going
to do 1.1.0 soon.

-- 
Ben Reser <ben@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 14 10:42:44 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.