I played with rsync and the way I did it wasn't that
great for me. I mounted apache to the filesystem with
davfs and then ran rscync on the davfs virtual disk.
It chewed up a bunch of cpu and it also left the
password visable when you did a "ps -ef" command which
was unacceptable. Didn't think of doing a local
export and fsync-ing that. That would have worked
much better than wget for sure.
Wget is fine for me and equivalent to some non
subversion mirroring we do. Again, plenty of
bandwidth...
On the local Lan, it takes a few hours to do the first
initial wget to seed the 80 gig mirror, and about 10
minutes to update the mirror after you apply the
Last-Modified patch of course.
Lee
--- Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> Lee Thompson wrote:
>
> >I assumed that would dump 80 gig each time. The
> >mirror feature of wget will only get updates kind
> of
> >like rsync as long as you have Last-Modified in the
> >http header since wget is not http 1.1.
> >
> >
> Oh, right. No, export won't do a minimal update.
>
> Hm. Well, regular updates of a local working copy,
> then rsync (telling
> it to ignore the .svn directories). Your can put all
> of that into a
> post-commit hook, and I suspect rsync will be more
> efficient than wget.
>
>
> --
> Brane Čibej <brane@xbc.nu>
> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jun 14 02:02:43 2004