[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] "simple" custom keywords implementation

From: <kfogel_at_collab.net>
Date: 2004-06-11 21:19:22 CEST

Archie Cobbs <archie@dellroad.org> writes:
> What about untagged branches? Maybe they should just be elided, they
> are completely useless anyway. Or they could be given machine generated
> names and dumped into some untagged-branches/ directory.

The latter is what happens right now, yes.

> But I think it's worthwhile to do the thought experiment of asking what
> is the best we could feasibly do (putting aside for the moment the
> question of who's actually going to find time to write the code), because
> what you get from the conversion process is one of the most critical
> issues for a project like FreeBSD deciding to move to SVN.

I'm not so sure. Exploring that question reveals that the answer is
essentially infinitely deep... There are always N improvements
possible. You have to prune the tree of what you consider, for
sanity :-).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 11 22:43:44 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.