Greg Hudson wrote:
>On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 12:29, Tobias Ringström wrote:
>
>
>>I believe this was fixed in r9939. It turned out to be independant of
>>the platform, but it would be great if you or someone else could retest
>>on Win32 just to be sure that there aren't other issues as well. I guess
>>nobody has been running stress.pl on fs_fs a lot before.
>>
>>
>Josh has done some stress.pl tests in the past, but I broke that code
>(the thing you fixed in r9939) more recently than that.
>
>
Ahh, thanks for clarifying that. The quality of the work on fsfs (and
the resulting code) has been (and is) truly outstanding, so I could not
really believe that there had been no stress testing.
/Tobias
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 9 22:54:15 2004