Re: Version control requirements for GCC

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> > In case nobody but ghudson and me noticed, the GCC project is (again)
> > looking for something that would replace CVS. Here's the initial post
> > and thread:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-06/msg00264.html
> > I think we should follow this more closely. We'd have to add a few
> > features to cover most of this list, but I think that getting the GCC
> > repository to move to Subversion would be a huge win.
>
> Damn, that's a long list of requirements they've got there...

I doubt they're going to find anything that meets all the
requirements, which means they'll have to drop some eventually.

The emphasis on disconnected commits is a bit surprising. They're
useful, I just didn't realize they were *that* useful for this
particular development team.

(I wonder if Ian considered svk.)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Jun 9 20:29:07 2004