Re: [Issue 1597] switch to apr_temp_dir_get() at APR 0.9.6

Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:

>On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 17:53, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>
>>sussman@tigris.org wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Does the imminent release of APR 1.0 mean we can make svn 1.1 *require* it, thus
>>>allowing us to remove our redundant code from libsvn_subr (thereby closing this
>>>issue?)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>We can't require a particular version of APR until we require a version
>>of httpd that uses that version of APR. I guess that would mean
>>httpd-2.1, which hasn't been released yet.
>>
>>
>
>Huh? Are you saying that if httpd-2.0.50 is released sometime after APR
>1.0 is released, httpd won't be using APR 1.0?
>
>
Yes. AFAIK the httpd-2.0.x series is tied to the apr-0.9.x branch.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org