Re: Bug: svn-1.0.4 stops at 65536 revisions

C. Michael Pilato wrote:

> John Peacock <jpeacock@rowman.com> writes:
>
>
>>As an aside to the list, why is this not
>>
>> typedef unsigned long int svn_revnum_t;
>
>
> Because we make use of negative values to indicate throughout the
> codebase that the revision number is not valid or that a revision
> number argument is not applicable.

You don't have to all pile on at once! :0

John

-- 
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org