Re: Speeding up blame

On Sun, 23 May 2004, Greg Hudson wrote:

> On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 18:51, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > I don't understand this. If we add a new function pointer to the rA
> > vtable, then any RA implementation that is done for 1.0 will be
> > ABI-incompatible with 1.1. Or isn't the compatibility guarantees about
> > ABI?
>
> We don't actually have a mechanism for third-party RA implementations.
> (We have a mechanism for dynamic loading, but that's still controlled by
> a hardcoded table in libsvn_ra.) So we don't have to worry about that.
>
Thansk. That was what I wanted to hear:-)

Regards,
//Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 23 15:10:45 2004