Just a few typo fixes for lj_article.txt.  It looks like there are quite
a few differences in the actual published version of the article at
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4768.  I'm willing to
incorporate these into lj_article.txt if it's not a problem.  What do
you think?
Log:
* doc/user/lj_article.txt: Fix typos.
  Michael W Thelen <thelenm@cs.utah.edu>.
Index: doc/user/lj_article.txt
===================================================================
--- doc/user/lj_article.txt	(revision 9852)
+++ doc/user/lj_article.txt	(working copy)
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 The RCS back-end cannot store binary files efficiently, and branching
 and tagging operations can grow to be very slow.  CVS also uses the
 network inefficiently; many users are annoyed by long waits, because
-file differeces are sent in only one direction (from server to client,
+file differences are sent in only one direction (from server to client,
 but not from client to server), and binary files are always
 transmitted in their entirety.
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 In 1995, Karl Fogel and Jim Blandy founded Cyclic Software, a company
 for commercially supporting and improving CVS.  Cyclic made the first
 public release of a network-enabled CVS (contributed by Cygnus
-software.)  In 1999, Karl Fogel published a book about CVS and the
+software).  In 1999, Karl Fogel published a book about CVS and the
 open-source development model it enables (cvsbook.red-bean.com).  Karl
 and Jim had long talked about writing a replacement for CVS; Jim had
 even drafted a new, theoretical repository design.  Finally, in
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
 The team settled on a few simple goals: it was decided that Subversion
 would be designed as a functional replacement for CVS.  It would do
 everything that CVS does -- preserving the same development model
-while fixing the flaws in CVS's (lack-of) design.  Existing CVS users
+while fixing the flaws in CVS's (lack of) design.  Existing CVS users
 would be the target audience: any CVS user should be able to start
 using Subversion with little effort.  Any other SCM "bonus features"
 were decided to be of secondary importance (at least before a 1.0
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
 --> The Subversion filesystem.  
 
 The Subversion Filesystem is *not* a kernel-level filesystem that one
-would install in an operating system (like the Linux ext2 fs.)
+would install in an operating system (like the Linux ext2 fs).
 Instead, it refers to the design of Subversion's repository.  The
 repository is built on top of a database -- currently Berkeley DB --
 and thus is a collection of .db files.  However, a library accesses
-- 
Michael W. Thelen
We who cut mere stones must always be envisioning cathedrals.
                -- Quarry worker's creed
Received on Sat May 22 07:45:59 2004