Re: Exclusive Locking: design in a nutshell

On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 08:28, Josh Pieper wrote:

> I think you are proposing intermingling the implementation of two
> distinct and parallel features. If they are both implemented
> separately, you gain flexibility and decrease the complexity of
> implementation.

+1. You've said it better than I can. I don't see the reason for
lock-txns anymore. (And it doesn't seem intuitive to me at all for a
lock-holder to enter a "pocket universe" where she's the only person
able to write *or* read what she's locked.)

Branko, can you comment on my 2nd draft proposal? Yes, I know it's
phrased in a webdav-y way, but I can just easily formulate it in a
libsvn_fs-y way if you want me to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 21 17:50:09 2004