[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

[PATCH] Re: I can't maintain Fedora Core 1 Subversion RPMs any more (Re: 1.0.3 release scheduling)

From: Matthew Rich <mrich_at_tigris.org>
Date: 2004-05-21 06:18:04 CEST

Unless there is a better solution (or you're building without tests),
this patch should fix a failure in the getopt test. I have to wonder
exactly why that test even works though there weren't any changes
between 1.0.3 and 1.0.2 yet 1.0.2 works fine, hmm, perhaps something I

The fact that your package build scripts require a repository working
copy seems a bit contrary to the whole: pristine-source->port&patch
concept though, which is right up there with: why doesn't tigris.org
support SSL (the mind boggles), but in any case 1.0.3 is built. You can
have them if you want them :)

Do you generally sign your packages?

1.0.3 : FC1

On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 15:23, David Summers wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2004 Matthew_Rich@playstation.sony.com wrote:
> > Did you find anyone to do this? I might, if I can find a clean FC1 box
> > that doesn't have custom RPMs all over it, and the _time_, am I just
> > asking for trouble here? :).
> >
> Nope, as far as I know of, you are the first.
> You might start by releaseing the 1.0.3 that just came out.
> Please let me know if you have any questions and I'll be glad to try to
> answer them.

Matthew Rich <mrich@tigris.org>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Received on Fri May 21 06:33:55 2004

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.