Re: svn_cmdline_printf and errors

Tobias Ringström wrote:

> Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
>
>> b) Ditch the return value of the new functions in favour of void and
>> ignore failures (hoping for SIGPIPE kicking in as we do today).
>>
>> Opinions?
>
>
> FWIW, we currently set the SIGPIPE handler to SIG_IGN, which means
> that we depend on getting an error return value from the write functions.

This is for printing progress and error messages to the command line. I
think we should act like normal printf, FWIW, apr_vformatter returns the
character count.

-- Brane

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun May 16 22:19:58 2004